What does listing profile remediation cover?
Listing profile remediation addresses a platform warning, verification request or profile inconsistency through a documented review and response. It is for teams that need to understand what information is missing, correct project details, or present evidence in a clearer and more complete form.
The work starts by identifying the affected profile and the exact issue shown there. We compare the public profile with the project’s current information and review materials such as audit reports, KYC documentation and official project records. This helps separate a factual error from a missing document or an unresolved platform request.
A typical scope can include:
- A review of the warning, profile fields and related public information.
- An evidence checklist matched to the specific issue.
- Editing and organizing project descriptions or supporting files.
- Preparation of a response or update for the relevant platform workflow.
- Follow-up guidance and a record of submitted materials.
The service is not a replacement for an audit or KYC provider. If a required document does not exist, we identify that gap and explain what the project team needs to obtain or clarify. For broader listing work, see Listings and verification.
How do we review an issue across CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko and DEX platforms?
We match the response to the platform and the issue rather than sending the same generic explanation everywhere. The first practical step is to record the warning or request as displayed, note which profile fields are affected, and gather the project’s authoritative sources.
For CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko, the review focuses on the relevant listing information, verification details and supporting records available to the project. For DEXTools and DEXScreener, we check the token or pair profile details and the project information that can be updated or clarified. Where the problem concerns contract identity, token information or a project change, we trace the supporting details back to the appropriate explorer or official project source.
Before preparing a response, we check that:
- Token and contract references match the project’s current records.
- Website, social and contact details point to official destinations.
- Audit and KYC materials are current and attributable to the right entity or contract.
- Every claim in the response can be supported by a document or public source.
If the issue is specifically a profile update on DEXTools or DEXScreener, the related profile update service may be a better fit. For a warning tied to an exchange or tracker review, we first confirm the scope before recommending work.
What documents and deliverables should a project prepare?
A strong remediation file makes the project’s identity, token details and claims easy to verify. You should prepare the documents you already have and identify anything that is missing; do not alter a report or present an unverified claim as established fact.
The exact evidence depends on the warning. Useful materials may include an audit report and its scope, KYC confirmation where available, official contract and explorer links, project ownership or entity information, and current website or token documentation. If there has been a contract migration, rebrand or supply change, include the timeline and records that explain it. Our contract migration and rebranding support covers those update scenarios.
The agreed deliverables can include an issue summary, a platform-specific evidence checklist, a consistency review of public project information, prepared response text, and a submission and follow-up log. We also flag conflicts between documents before they become part of a platform response.
To keep the review efficient, send one project contact, the exact profile links, screenshots or text of the warning, and a folder of source documents. Include only information you are authorized to share. If sensitive records need restricted handling, agree the transfer method and access before sending them.
How does the remediation process work?
The process turns an unclear warning into a defined set of evidence and actions. The schedule begins when we have the profile details and source materials needed to assess the issue; a missing document or unresolved project fact can add work before a submission is ready.
We first confirm the affected platform, the requested outcome and the materials available. After reviewing them, we outline the gaps and agree the scope. The team then prepares the relevant evidence and response, checks it with your project contact, and supports the agreed submission or update. We record what was sent and what follow-up is outstanding so your team can track the case without relying on scattered messages.
The workflow usually includes:
- Intake of profile links, warning details and project documents.
- Evidence review and a written gap list.
- Scope confirmation, including who supplies missing information.
- Preparation and client review of the response or profile updates.
- Submission support and status tracking.
A remediation project is priced from $1,190 / project. The fee covers the agreed scope, not an outcome controlled by a third party. We confirm the deliverables and responsibilities before work starts. You can also review our wider verification services if the issue requires audit or KYC coordination.
What can remediation resolve, and what remains outside the project’s control?
Remediation can improve the accuracy, completeness and clarity of a profile response; it cannot decide how a platform evaluates that response. The project team controls the accuracy of its facts and the documents it supplies, while platforms control their review processes and profile decisions.
Algorithms, listing reviews and volume requirements are platform-controlled, and no agency can guarantee a warning will be removed, a profile will be approved, or a review will finish by a particular date. We also cannot promise token price, virality or organic volume. Our commitment is to deliver the agreed review, evidence organization, response preparation and submission support.
Before authorizing work, ask for a scope that names the platform, issue, documents to be reviewed, deliverables and project responsibilities. Check that the proposal distinguishes between work we perform and a decision made by a platform. Avoid anyone who offers a certain platform outcome without first reviewing the warning and evidence.
If your main need is profile correction rather than a warning response, consider CoinMarketCap community verification or circulating supply verification. If the issue is a basic token logo or explorer information, explorer token information updates may be more direct. For other listing tasks, browse CoinMarketCap listing support.
Prices
| Service | Price | Quote |
|---|---|---|
| Listing Warnings | from $1,190 / project |
Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.
How it works
- Share the issueSend the affected profile links, warning details and a project contact. Include the platform’s exact wording where possible.
- Provide source materialsShare available audit, KYC, contract and project records through an agreed channel. Tell us which materials are missing or restricted.
- Review the evidenceWe compare the warning with the profile and supporting information, then return a gap list and proposed scope.
- Approve the responseYour team confirms the facts and any prepared response or profile changes before they are submitted.
- Track the agreed workWe support the specified submission or update and record follow-up actions for your team.
Frequently asked questions
How much does listing profile remediation cost?
The service starts at $1,190 / project. The final scope depends on the platform, the warning or profile issue, the documents available and the deliverables required. We confirm the work and responsibilities before starting.
How long does a remediation project take?
Timing depends on how quickly the project can provide complete evidence and on the work required to prepare a clear response. Platform review time is outside the agency’s control. We map the project tasks and dependencies after reviewing the warning and materials.
What should I send for an initial review?
Send the affected profile links, the warning text or a screenshot, official project links, and any relevant audit, KYC, contract or token documentation. If a document is unavailable, say so rather than substituting an unsupported claim.
Can you guarantee that a warning will be removed?
No. Algorithms, listing reviews and volume requirements are controlled by the platforms, so approval or warning removal cannot be guaranteed. We can commit to the agreed review, evidence organization, response preparation and submission support—not to a platform decision, price, virality or organic volume.
Is remediation the same as a trending campaign?
No. Remediation is about profile accuracy, evidence and responses to platform warnings or requests. A trending campaign is a separate visibility service and does not replace documentation or resolve a verification issue. Choose the service based on the problem you need to address.
Can you work with a project that needs both KYC and an audit?
We can review the materials the project already has and identify which evidence is missing for the agreed remediation scope. Audit work and KYC checks are distinct processes; the project may need to obtain those from the appropriate provider before a complete response can be prepared.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…